Côte d'Ivoire vs Malawi: People living with HIV/AIDS, total
Côte d'Ivoire
390,000 low estimate
in 2009
Malawi
830,000 low estimate
in 2009
Côte d'Ivoire rank
12th
Malawi rank
9th
People living with HIV/AIDS, total over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 830,000 low estimate against 390,000 low estimate in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 440,000 low estimate.
That makes Malawi's figure about 2.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 12th and Malawi ranks 9th of 48 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 311,900 low estimate | 520,000 low estimate | 208,100 low estimate | Malawi |
| 2000s | 487,000 low estimate | 791,000 low estimate | 304,000 low estimate | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people living with hiv/aids, total, Côte d'Ivoire or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 830,000 low estimate against 390,000 low estimate in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2009.
- What is the difference in people living with hiv/aids, total between Côte d'Ivoire and Malawi?
- 440,000 low estimate, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Malawi?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Malawi rank globally for people living with hiv/aids, total?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 12th and Malawi ranks 9th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as People living with HIV/AIDS, total (low estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated total number of people with HIV/AIDS is the number of people living with HIV. Depending on the reliability of the data available, there may be more or less uncertainty surrounding each estimate.