Sur vs Tokelau: Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate)
Sur
59.8%
in 2024
Tokelau
89.9%
in 2024
Sur rank
1st
Tokelau rank
4th
Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate) over time
- Sur
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 89.9% against 59.8% in Sur, a difference of 30.1%.
That makes Tokelau's figure about 1.5 times Sur's.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Sur ranks 1st and Tokelau ranks 4th of 2 regions.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 26.6% | 77.7% | 51.1% | Tokelau |
| 1990s | 35.2% | 84.1% | 48.9% | Tokelau |
| 2000s | 45.8% | 87.6% | 41.8% | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 53.9% | 88.6% | 34.7% | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 58.5% | 89.8% | 31.3% | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate), Sur or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 89.9% against 59.8% in Sur as of 2024.
- What is the difference in overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate) between Sur and Tokelau?
- 30.1%, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Tokelau?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Sur and Tokelau rank globally for overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate)?
- Sur ranks 1st and Tokelau ranks 4th of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.