Mus vs Tokelau: Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate)
Mus
54.3%
in 2024
Tokelau
89.9%
in 2024
Mus rank
2nd
Tokelau rank
4th
Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate) over time
- Mus
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 89.9% against 54.3% in Mus, a difference of 35.6%.
That makes Tokelau's figure about 1.7 times Mus's.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 2nd and Tokelau ranks 4th of 2 regions.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 27.3% | 77.7% | 50.4% | Tokelau |
| 1990s | 37.3% | 84.1% | 46.9% | Tokelau |
| 2000s | 45.7% | 87.6% | 41.9% | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 50.6% | 88.6% | 38.0% | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 53.4% | 89.8% | 36.4% | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate), Mus or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 89.9% against 54.3% in Mus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate) between Mus and Tokelau?
- 35.6%, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Tokelau?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Mus and Tokelau rank globally for overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate)?
- Mus ranks 2nd and Tokelau ranks 4th of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (crude estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.