Sur vs Tokelau: Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate)
Sur
59.9%
in 2024
Tokelau
90.3%
in 2024
Sur rank
1st
Tokelau rank
3rd
Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) over time
- Sur
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 90.3% against 59.9% in Sur, a difference of 30.4%.
That makes Tokelau's figure about 1.5 times Sur's.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Sur ranks 1st and Tokelau ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30.2% | 78.8% | 48.6% | Tokelau |
| 1990s | 38.3% | 84.4% | 46.1% | Tokelau |
| 2000s | 46.9% | 87.3% | 40.4% | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 54.2% | 89.1% | 34.9% | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 58.7% | 90.1% | 31.4% | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate), Sur or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 90.3% against 59.9% in Sur as of 2024.
- What is the difference in overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) between Sur and Tokelau?
- 30.4%, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Tokelau?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Sur and Tokelau rank globally for overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate)?
- Sur ranks 1st and Tokelau ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.