Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Obesity in men vs. women
Cape Verde
8.8%
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
8.5%
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
150th
Equatorial Guinea rank
153rd
Obesity in men vs. women over time
- Cape Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 8.8% against 8.5% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 199 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 4.8% | 4.2% | 0.7% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 6.8% | 6.1% | 0.8% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 8.3% | 7.9% | 0.4% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher obesity in men vs. women, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cape Verde, at 8.8% against 8.5% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in obesity in men vs. women between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for obesity in men vs. women?
- Cape Verde ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Obesity in men vs. women. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Obesity is defined as having a body-mass index (BMI) equal to, or greater than, 30. BMI is a person's weight (in kilograms) divided by their height (in meters) squared.