Mus vs Tokelau: Obesity among adults, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate)
Mus
21.1%
in 2024
Tokelau
70.0%
in 2024
Mus rank
2nd
Tokelau rank
5th
Obesity among adults, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate) over time
- Mus
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 70.0% against 21.1% in Mus, a difference of 48.9%.
That makes Tokelau's figure about 3.3 times Mus's.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 2nd and Tokelau ranks 5th of 2 regions.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.7% | 47.3% | 41.6% | Tokelau |
| 1990s | 9.7% | 56.1% | 46.4% | Tokelau |
| 2000s | 14.3% | 62.4% | 48.1% | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 17.7% | 65.7% | 48.0% | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 20.3% | 69.4% | 49.1% | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher obesity among adults, bmi ≥ 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate), Mus or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 70.0% against 21.1% in Mus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in obesity among adults, bmi ≥ 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate) between Mus and Tokelau?
- 48.9%, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Tokelau?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Mus and Tokelau rank globally for obesity among adults, bmi ≥ 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate)?
- Mus ranks 2nd and Tokelau ranks 5th of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Obesity among adults, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.