Rwanda vs South-East Asia (WHO region): Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying

Rwanda
5.84 million
in 2024
South-East Asia (WHO region)
16.69 million
in 2021
Rwanda rank
2nd
South-East Asia (WHO region) rank
3rd

Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying over time

  • Rwanda
  • South-East Asia (WHO region)
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M201520192024

How they compare

South-East Asia (WHO region) currently reports 16.69 million against 5.84 million in Rwanda, a difference of 10.85 million.

That makes South-East Asia (WHO region)'s figure about 2.9 times Rwanda's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, South-East Asia (WHO region) has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 2nd and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 3rd of 58 countries.

South-East Asia (WHO region) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda South-East Asia (WHO region) Difference Ahead
2010s 2.48 million 39.56 million 37.08 million South-East Asia (WHO region)
2020s 5.11 million 20.80 million 15.69 million South-East Asia (WHO region)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying, Rwanda or South-East Asia (WHO region)?
South-East Asia (WHO region), at 16.69 million against 5.84 million in Rwanda as of 2021.
What is the difference in number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying between Rwanda and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
10.85 million, with South-East Asia (WHO region) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and South-East Asia (WHO region) rank globally for number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying?
Rwanda ranks 2nd and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 3rd of 58 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying (IRS). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs South-East Asia (WHO region): Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-protected-from-malaria-by-indoor-residual-spraying-irs/rwanda/south-east-asia-who-region/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-protected-from-malaria-by-indoor-residual-spraying-irs/rwanda/south-east-asia-who-region/">Rwanda vs South-East Asia (WHO region): Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying (IRS)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
64 places, 532 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed