Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying

Equatorial Guinea
86,682
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
103,261
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
37th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
34th

Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
50.0k100.0k150.0k201520192024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 103,261 against 86,682 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 16,579.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 34th of 58 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2010s 71,882 104,471 32,589 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 86,682 103,261 16,579 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 103,261 against 86,682 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
16,579, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 34th of 58 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying (IRS). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-protected-from-malaria-by-indoor-residual-spraying-irs/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-protected-from-malaria-by-indoor-residual-spraying-irs/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying (IRS)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
64 places, 532 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed