Australia vs Bhutan: Number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency
Australia
14
in 2022
Bhutan
14
in 2022
Australia rank
24th
Bhutan rank
24th
Number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency over time
- Australia
- Bhutan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 14 against 14 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 24th and Bhutan ranks 24th of 141 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16 | 3 | 13 | Australia |
| 2010s | 31.56 | 9.4 | 22.16 | Australia |
| 2020s | 24.4 | 14 | 10.4 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency, Australia or Bhutan?
- Australia, at 14 against 14 in Bhutan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency between Australia and Bhutan?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency?
- Australia ranks 24th and Bhutan ranks 24th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.