Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Newborns protected against tetanus
Mauritius
97.0%
in 2024
Sri Lanka
97.0%
in 2024
Mauritius rank
18th
Sri Lanka rank
18th
Newborns protected against tetanus over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 97.0% against 97.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mauritius ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 18th of 106 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 27.9% | 53.4% | 25.5% | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 75.3% | 80.9% | 5.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 83.6% | 90.9% | 7.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 95.0% | 95.3% | 0.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 98.6% | 1.6% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher newborns protected against tetanus, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritius, at 97.0% against 97.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in newborns protected against tetanus between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for newborns protected against tetanus?
- Mauritius ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 18th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (WHO), published as Newborns protected against tetanus (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Newborns protected against tetanus are the percentage of births by women of child-bearing age who are immunized against tetanus.