Low income vs Malaysia: Newborns protected against tetanus
Low income
78.1%
in 2024
Malaysia
96.0%
in 2024
Low income rank
25th
Malaysia rank
26th
Newborns protected against tetanus over time
- Low income
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 96.0% against 78.1% in Low income, a difference of 17.9%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Low income's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 25th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 27 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 21.7% | 51.0% | 29.3% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 48.4% | 83.7% | 35.3% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 71.5% | 87.2% | 15.7% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 80.2% | 90.6% | 10.4% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 80.3% | 95.4% | 15.1% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher newborns protected against tetanus, Low income or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 96.0% against 78.1% in Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in newborns protected against tetanus between Low income and Malaysia?
- 17.9%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Malaysia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.
- How do Low income and Malaysia rank globally for newborns protected against tetanus?
- Low income ranks 25th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (WHO), published as Newborns protected against tetanus (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Newborns protected against tetanus are the percentage of births by women of child-bearing age who are immunized against tetanus.