Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: Newborns protected against tetanus
Kiribati
93.0%
in 2024
Solomon Islands
93.0%
in 2024
Kiribati rank
38th
Solomon Islands rank
38th
Newborns protected against tetanus over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 93.0% against 93.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Kiribati ranks 38th and Solomon Islands ranks 38th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.0% | 80.3% | 26.3% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 87.6% | 85.0% | 2.6% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 93.0% | 91.2% | 1.8% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher newborns protected against tetanus, Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Kiribati, at 93.0% against 93.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in newborns protected against tetanus between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for newborns protected against tetanus?
- Kiribati ranks 38th and Solomon Islands ranks 38th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (WHO), published as Newborns protected against tetanus (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Newborns protected against tetanus are the percentage of births by women of child-bearing age who are immunized against tetanus.