El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Newborns protected against tetanus
El Salvador
92.0%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
90.0%
in 2024
El Salvador rank
50th
Zimbabwe rank
53rd
Newborns protected against tetanus over time
- El Salvador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 92.0% against 90.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
El Salvador ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 106 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 26.8% | 49.0% | 22.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 62.9% | 66.3% | 3.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 88.2% | 77.3% | 10.9% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 90.2% | 76.0% | 14.2% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 92.8% | 88.6% | 4.2% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher newborns protected against tetanus, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
- El Salvador, at 92.0% against 90.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in newborns protected against tetanus between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 2.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for newborns protected against tetanus?
- El Salvador ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (WHO), published as Newborns protected against tetanus (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Newborns protected against tetanus are the percentage of births by women of child-bearing age who are immunized against tetanus.