Uganda vs Zambia: New HIV infections, low estimate
Uganda
100,000
in 2009
Zambia
62,000
in 2009
Uganda rank
4th
Zambia rank
7th
New HIV infections, low estimate over time
- Uganda
- Zambia
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 100,000 against 62,000 in Zambia, a difference of 38,000.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Uganda ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 7th of 48 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79,800 | 56,600 | 23,200 | Uganda |
| 2000s | 89,900 | 75,700 | 14,200 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, low estimate, Uganda or Zambia?
- Uganda, at 100,000 against 62,000 in Zambia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, low estimate between Uganda and Zambia?
- 38,000, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zambia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Uganda and Zambia rank globally for new hiv infections, low estimate?
- Uganda ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 7th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, low estimate.