Sudan vs Zimbabwe: New HIV infections, low estimate
Sudan
38,000
in 2009
Zimbabwe
45,000
in 2009
Sudan rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
11th
New HIV infections, low estimate over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 45,000 against 38,000 in Sudan, a difference of 7,000.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 48 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,580 | 194,000 | 192,420 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 22,170 | 80,100 | 57,930 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, low estimate, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 45,000 against 38,000 in Sudan as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, low estimate between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 7,000, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for new hiv infections, low estimate?
- Sudan ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, low estimate.