North Africa vs Uganda: New HIV infections, low estimate
North Africa
4,800
in 2009
Uganda
100,000
in 2009
North Africa rank
6th
Uganda rank
4th
New HIV infections, low estimate over time
- North Africa
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 100,000 against 4,800 in North Africa, a difference of 95,200.
That makes Uganda's figure about 20.8 times North Africa's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
North Africa ranks 6th and Uganda ranks 4th of 6 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Africa | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,210 | 79,800 | 77,590 | Uganda |
| 2000s | 5,030 | 89,900 | 84,870 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, low estimate, North Africa or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 100,000 against 4,800 in North Africa as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, low estimate between North Africa and Uganda?
- 95,200, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Uganda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do North Africa and Uganda rank globally for new hiv infections, low estimate?
- North Africa ranks 6th and Uganda ranks 4th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, low estimate.