Namibia vs Sierra Leone: New HIV infections, low estimate
Namibia
2,100
in 2009
Sierra Leone
3,000
in 2009
Namibia rank
32nd
Sierra Leone rank
31st
New HIV infections, low estimate over time
- Namibia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 3,000 against 2,100 in Namibia, a difference of 900.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 32nd and Sierra Leone ranks 31st of 48 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,980 | 850 | 11,130 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 10,020 | 3,530 | 6,490 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, low estimate, Namibia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 3,000 against 2,100 in Namibia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, low estimate between Namibia and Sierra Leone?
- 900, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sierra Leone?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Namibia and Sierra Leone rank globally for new hiv infections, low estimate?
- Namibia ranks 32nd and Sierra Leone ranks 31st of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, low estimate.