Madagascar vs Namibia: New HIV infections, low estimate
Madagascar
1,800
in 2009
Namibia
2,100
in 2009
Madagascar rank
34th
Namibia rank
32nd
New HIV infections, low estimate over time
- Madagascar
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2,100 against 1,800 in Madagascar, a difference of 300.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 34th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,360 | 11,980 | 10,620 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1,840 | 10,020 | 8,180 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, low estimate, Madagascar or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 2,100 against 1,800 in Madagascar as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, low estimate between Madagascar and Namibia?
- 300, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for new hiv infections, low estimate?
- Madagascar ranks 34th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, low estimate.