Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: New HIV infections, low estimate
Guinea-Bissau
1,400
in 2009
Namibia
2,100
in 2009
Guinea-Bissau rank
35th
Namibia rank
32nd
New HIV infections, low estimate over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2,100 against 1,400 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 700.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 35th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,040 | 11,980 | 10,940 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1,760 | 10,020 | 8,260 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, low estimate, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 2,100 against 1,400 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, low estimate between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
- 700, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for new hiv infections, low estimate?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 35th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, low estimate.