Sudan vs Zimbabwe: New HIV infections, high estimate
Sudan
74,000
in 2009
Zimbabwe
80,000
in 2009
Sudan rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
9th
New HIV infections, high estimate over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 80,000 against 74,000 in Sudan, a difference of 6,000.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 48 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,520 | 245,000 | 236,480 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 37,500 | 116,800 | 79,300 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, high estimate, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 80,000 against 74,000 in Sudan as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, high estimate between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 6,000, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for new hiv infections, high estimate?
- Sudan ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, high estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, high estimate.