North Africa vs Zimbabwe: New HIV infections, high estimate
North Africa
15,200
in 2009
Zimbabwe
80,000
in 2009
North Africa rank
6th
Zimbabwe rank
9th
New HIV infections, high estimate over time
- North Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 80,000 against 15,200 in North Africa, a difference of 64,800.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.3 times North Africa's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
North Africa ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 6 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,490 | 245,000 | 237,510 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 10,780 | 116,800 | 106,020 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, high estimate, North Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 80,000 against 15,200 in North Africa as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, high estimate between North Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 64,800, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do North Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for new hiv infections, high estimate?
- North Africa ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, high estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, high estimate.