Namibia vs Rwanda: New HIV infections, high estimate
Namibia
11,000
in 2009
Rwanda
15,000
in 2009
Namibia rank
24th
Rwanda rank
21st
New HIV infections, high estimate over time
- Namibia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 15,000 against 11,000 in Namibia, a difference of 4,000.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Namibia ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 48 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,390 | 21,600 | 3,210 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 18,300 | 16,100 | 2,200 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections, high estimate, Namibia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 15,000 against 11,000 in Namibia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections, high estimate between Namibia and Rwanda?
- 4,000, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for new hiv infections, high estimate?
- Namibia ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, high estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, high estimate.