Guinea vs Namibia: New HIV infections, high estimate

Guinea
8,400
in 2009
Namibia
11,000
in 2009
Guinea rank
27th
Namibia rank
24th

New HIV infections, high estimate over time

  • Guinea
  • Namibia
020.0k40.0k60.0k199019992009

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 11,000 against 8,400 in Guinea, a difference of 2,600.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 24th of 48 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 27,500 21,438 6,062 Guinea
2000s 9,480 18,300 8,820 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher new hiv infections, high estimate, Guinea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 11,000 against 8,400 in Guinea as of 2009.
What is the difference in new hiv infections, high estimate between Guinea and Namibia?
2,600, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Namibia?
18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
How do Guinea and Namibia rank globally for new hiv infections, high estimate?
Guinea ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 24th of 48 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections, high estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
New HIV infections, high estimate
Source
UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
54 places, 1,074 data points, 1990–2009
Last refreshed

Estimated number of people newly infected with HIV, high estimate.