Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate
Tanzania
6,200
in 2009
Zimbabwe
7,000
in 2009
Tanzania rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
8th
New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate over time
- Tanzania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 7,000 against 6,200 in Tanzania, a difference of 800.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.
Tanzania ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16,020 | 18,510 | 2,490 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 14,500 | 14,460 | 40 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate, Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 7,000 against 6,200 in Tanzania as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate between Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
- 800, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate?
- Tanzania ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of children (0-14 years) newly infected with HIV, low estimate.