Namibia vs Rwanda: New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate
Namibia
1,000
in 2009
Rwanda
1,100
in 2009
Namibia rank
20th
Rwanda rank
18th
New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate over time
- Namibia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1,100 against 1,000 in Namibia, a difference of 100.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 38 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 740 | 2,160 | 1,420 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 1,360 | 1,750 | 390 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate, Namibia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1,100 against 1,000 in Namibia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate between Namibia and Rwanda?
- 100, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate?
- Namibia ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of children (0-14 years) newly infected with HIV, low estimate.