Congo vs Namibia: New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate
Congo
1,000
in 2009
Namibia
1,000
in 2009
Congo rank
20th
Namibia rank
20th
New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate over time
- Congo
- Namibia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,000 against 1,000 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 20th of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,000 | 740 | 260 | Congo |
| 2000s | 1,000 | 1,360 | 360 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate, Congo or Namibia?
- Congo, at 1,000 against 1,000 in Namibia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate between Congo and Namibia?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for new hiv infections (0-14 years), low estimate?
- Congo ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 20th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNAIDS and the WHO's Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, published as New HIV infections (0-14 years), low estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of children (0-14 years) newly infected with HIV, low estimate.