Sur vs Tonga: New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Sur
97.0%
in 2024
Tonga
100.0%
in 2023
Sur rank
1st
Tonga rank
1st
New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Sur
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 100.0% against 97.0% in Sur, a difference of 3.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sur ahead.
Sur ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sur averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 62.2% | 30.0% | 32.2% | Sur |
| 2020s | 97.2% | 100.0% | 2.8% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Sur or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 100.0% against 97.0% in Sur as of 2023.
- What is the difference in new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Sur and Tonga?
- 3.0%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Tonga?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Sur and Tonga rank globally for new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Sur ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.