Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
100.0%
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 192 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.