South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
South Sudan
69.0%
in 2024
Sri Lanka
69.0%
in 2024
South Sudan rank
144th
Sri Lanka rank
144th
New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 69.0% against 69.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
South Sudan ranks 144th and Sri Lanka ranks 144th of 192 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.4% | 34.0% | 28.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 32.2% | 48.2% | 16.0% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, South Sudan or Sri Lanka?
- South Sudan, at 69.0% against 69.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Sri Lanka rank globally for new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- South Sudan ranks 144th and Sri Lanka ranks 144th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.