Mus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)
Mus
100.0%
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2019
Mus rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%) over time
- Mus
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mus currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mus ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 2 regions.
Mus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Mus or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mus, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Mus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Mus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Mus and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Mus ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.