Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Ecuador
100.0%
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Ecuador
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 192 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Ecuador or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Ecuador, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.