Congo vs Macao: New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Congo
99.0%
in 2024
Macao
98.0%
in 2024
Congo rank
50th
Macao rank
53rd
New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Congo
- Macao
How they compare
Congo currently reports 99.0% against 98.0% in Macao, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Macao ahead.
Congo ranks 50th and Macao ranks 53rd of 192 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.0% | 98.3% | 90.3% | Macao |
| 2020s | 77.6% | 98.2% | 20.6% | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Congo or Macao?
- Congo, at 99.0% against 98.0% in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Congo and Macao?
- 1.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Macao?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Macao rank globally for new cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Congo ranks 50th and Macao ranks 53rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.