Sri Lanka vs Sur: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Sri Lanka
99.0%
in 2022
Sur
95.0%
in 2022
Sri Lanka rank
4th
Sur rank
2nd
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sur
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 99.0% against 95.0% in Sur, a difference of 4.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sur ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Sur in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.9% | 92.4% | 1.5% | Sur |
| 2010s | 95.3% | 93.0% | 2.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 95.0% | 4.0% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Sri Lanka or Sur?
- Sri Lanka, at 99.0% against 95.0% in Sur as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Sri Lanka and Sur?
- 4.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sur?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sur rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.