Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Sao Tome and Principe
99.0%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
99.0%
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe rank
4th
Sri Lanka rank
4th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 99.0% against 99.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 105 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.0% | 91.8% | 6.2% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 99.0% | 95.3% | 3.7% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 99.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Sao Tome and Principe or Sri Lanka?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 99.0% against 99.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.