Peru vs Rwanda: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Peru
97.0%
in 2022
Rwanda
97.0%
in 2022
Peru rank
20th
Rwanda rank
20th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Peru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Peru currently reports 97.0% against 97.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Peru ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 105 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.0% | 79.8% | 14.8% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 88.0% | 89.0% | 1.0% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 95.7% | 97.0% | 1.3% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Peru or Rwanda?
- Peru, at 97.0% against 97.0% in Rwanda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Peru and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Peru ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.