Nicaragua vs Philippines: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Nicaragua
92.0%
in 2022
Philippines
91.0%
in 2022
Nicaragua rank
48th
Philippines rank
51st
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Nicaragua
- Philippines
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 92.0% against 91.0% in Philippines, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 48th and Philippines ranks 51st of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.6% | 58.2% | 26.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 83.7% | 84.4% | 0.7% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 91.3% | 91.0% | 0.3% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Nicaragua or Philippines?
- Nicaragua, at 92.0% against 91.0% in Philippines as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Nicaragua and Philippines?
- 1.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Philippines?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Philippines rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Nicaragua ranks 48th and Philippines ranks 51st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.