Nepal vs Nicaragua: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Nepal
91.0%
in 2022
Nicaragua
92.0%
in 2022
Nepal rank
51st
Nicaragua rank
48th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Nepal
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 92.0% against 91.0% in Nepal, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nepal ranks 51st and Nicaragua ranks 48th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.8% | 84.6% | 1.8% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 84.0% | 83.7% | 0.3% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 90.3% | 91.3% | 1.0% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Nepal or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 92.0% against 91.0% in Nepal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Nepal and Nicaragua?
- 1.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Nicaragua?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Nepal and Nicaragua rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Nepal ranks 51st and Nicaragua ranks 48th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.