Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Myanmar
88.0%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
89.0%
in 2022
Myanmar rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
63rd
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Myanmar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 89.0% against 88.0% in Myanmar, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 105 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.8% | 77.3% | 10.5% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 89.7% | 76.0% | 13.7% | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 88.7% | 87.7% | 1.0% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 89.0% against 88.0% in Myanmar as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 1.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Myanmar ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.