Mus vs Sri Lanka: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%)
Mus
97.0%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
99.0%
in 2022
Mus rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
4th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%) over time
- Mus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 99.0% against 97.0% in Mus, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 2 regions.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.6% | 90.9% | 7.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 95.0% | 95.3% | 0.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 99.0% | 2.0% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Mus or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 99.0% against 97.0% in Mus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Mus and Sri Lanka?
- 2.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Mus and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Mus ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.