Maldives vs Sur: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Maldives
99.0%
in 2022
Sur
95.0%
in 2022
Maldives rank
4th
Sur rank
2nd
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Maldives
- Sur
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 99.0% against 95.0% in Sur, a difference of 4.0%.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 105 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.4% | 92.4% | 2.0% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 97.0% | 93.0% | 4.0% | Maldives |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 95.0% | 4.0% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Maldives or Sur?
- Maldives, at 99.0% against 95.0% in Sur as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Maldives and Sur?
- 4.0%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Sur?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Maldives and Sur rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Maldives ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.