Malawi vs Nepal: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Malawi
90.0%
in 2022
Nepal
91.0%
in 2022
Malawi rank
54th
Nepal rank
51st
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Malawi
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 91.0% against 90.0% in Malawi, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 51st of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 82.8% | 3.5% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 88.7% | 84.0% | 4.7% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 90.0% | 90.3% | 0.3% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Malawi or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 91.0% against 90.0% in Malawi as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Malawi and Nepal?
- 1.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Malawi ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 51st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.