Malawi vs Namibia: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Malawi
90.0%
in 2022
Namibia
90.0%
in 2022
Malawi rank
54th
Namibia rank
54th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Malawi
- Namibia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 90.0% against 90.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 54th of 105 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 80.4% | 5.9% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 88.7% | 85.4% | 3.3% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 90.0% | 90.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Malawi or Namibia?
- Malawi, at 90.0% against 90.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Malawi and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Malawi and Namibia rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Malawi ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 54th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.