Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Kiribati
93.0%
in 2022
Solomon Islands
93.0%
in 2022
Kiribati rank
40th
Solomon Islands rank
40th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 93.0% against 93.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Kiribati ranks 40th and Solomon Islands ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.0% | 80.3% | 26.3% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 87.6% | 85.0% | 2.6% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 93.0% | 90.0% | 3.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Kiribati, at 93.0% against 93.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Kiribati ranks 40th and Solomon Islands ranks 40th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.