Kenya vs Timor-Leste: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Kenya
85.0%
in 2022
Timor-Leste
85.0%
in 2022
Kenya rank
70th
Timor-Leste rank
70th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Kenya
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 85.0% against 85.0% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.4% | 63.1% | 11.2% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 79.7% | 81.6% | 1.9% | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 86.0% | 84.3% | 1.7% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Kenya or Timor-Leste?
- Kenya, at 85.0% against 85.0% in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Kenya and Timor-Leste?
- 0.0%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Timor-Leste?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Kenya and Timor-Leste rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Kenya ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.