Jamaica vs Solomon Islands: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Jamaica
93.0%
in 2022
Solomon Islands
93.0%
in 2022
Jamaica rank
40th
Solomon Islands rank
40th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Jamaica
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 93.0% against 93.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Jamaica ranks 40th and Solomon Islands ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.3% | 78.6% | 20.3% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 83.1% | 85.0% | 1.9% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 91.7% | 90.0% | 1.7% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Jamaica or Solomon Islands?
- Jamaica, at 93.0% against 93.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Jamaica and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Solomon Islands?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Jamaica and Solomon Islands rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Jamaica ranks 40th and Solomon Islands ranks 40th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.