Jamaica vs Kiribati: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Jamaica
93.0%
in 2022
Kiribati
93.0%
in 2022
Jamaica rank
40th
Kiribati rank
40th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Jamaica
- Kiribati
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 93.0% against 93.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Jamaica ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.6% | 54.0% | 1.6% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 82.3% | 87.6% | 5.2% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 91.7% | 93.0% | 1.3% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Jamaica or Kiribati?
- Jamaica, at 93.0% against 93.0% in Kiribati as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Jamaica and Kiribati?
- 0.0%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Jamaica and Kiribati rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Jamaica ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.