High income (World Bank) vs Maldives: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
High income (World Bank)
99.0%
in 2022
Maldives
99.0%
in 2022
High income (World Bank) rank
1st
Maldives rank
4th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- High income (World Bank)
- Maldives
How they compare
High income (World Bank) currently reports 99.0% against 99.0% in Maldives, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Maldives ahead.
High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Maldives ranks 4th of 11 groups.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income (World Bank) | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.7% | 94.4% | 6.7% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 96.4% | 97.0% | 0.6% | Maldives |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 99.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), High income (World Bank) or Maldives?
- High income (World Bank), at 99.0% against 99.0% in Maldives as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between High income (World Bank) and Maldives?
- 0.0%, with High income (World Bank) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income (World Bank) and Maldives?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do High income (World Bank) and Maldives rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Maldives ranks 4th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.