Guatemala vs Namibia: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Guatemala
90.0%
in 2022
Namibia
90.0%
in 2022
Guatemala rank
54th
Namibia rank
54th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Guatemala
- Namibia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 90.0% against 90.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 54th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.5% | 80.4% | 10.9% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 87.5% | 85.4% | 2.1% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 90.7% | 90.0% | 0.7% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Guatemala or Namibia?
- Guatemala, at 90.0% against 90.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Guatemala and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Guatemala ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 54th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.