Europe (WHO region) vs Sri Lanka: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Europe (WHO region)
97.0%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
99.0%
in 2022
Europe (WHO region) rank
2nd
Sri Lanka rank
4th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Europe (WHO region)
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 99.0% against 97.0% in Europe (WHO region), a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Europe (WHO region) ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 11 groups.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe (WHO region) | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.2% | 90.9% | 27.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 91.5% | 95.3% | 3.8% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 96.3% | 99.0% | 2.7% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Europe (WHO region) or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 99.0% against 97.0% in Europe (WHO region) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Europe (WHO region) and Sri Lanka?
- 2.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe (WHO region) and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Europe (WHO region) and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Europe (WHO region) ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.