Eritrea vs Sri Lanka: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Eritrea
99.0%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
99.0%
in 2022
Eritrea rank
4th
Sri Lanka rank
4th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Eritrea
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 99.0% against 99.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Eritrea ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 105 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.8% | 90.9% | 7.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 95.3% | 95.3% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 99.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Eritrea or Sri Lanka?
- Eritrea, at 99.0% against 99.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Eritrea and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Eritrea and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Eritrea ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 4th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.